Thursday, September 20, 2007

Are we ready for Libertarian Socialism? Part 3

Duration: 08:12 minutes
Upload Time: 07-09-18 02:48:12
User: Clean97gti
:::: Favorites
:::: Top Videos of Day
Description:

final part - ITS OVER!!!!

Comments
LeeGeeGee ::: Favorites
Since "libertarianism" is by definition a philosophy of individual liberty, "libertarian socialism is a misnomer." Libertarian socalism is a philosophy of forced communalization. It does not respect individual sovereignty.
07-09-20 01:03:42
__________________________________________________
LeeGeeGee ::: Favorites
My point is that libertarian socialism is an enemy of individual liberty, since it will not allow an individual to own means of production.
07-09-20 01:01:55
__________________________________________________
Clean97gti ::: Favorites
very astute. Like I said, I've already presented all the information pertinent to the subject. If you continue to ignore it, so be it. I'm not responding to your fallacious arguments anymore. As for everyone else, I encourage them to read and educate themselves on the matter rather than listen to someone who can't even fathom that a word might have more than one meaning.
07-09-20 00:53:54
__________________________________________________
LeeGeeGee ::: Favorites
You cannot have it both ways. If you say a person has a right to own the product of his labor then you also have to agree that a person has a right to own a means of production that he built with his labor. That is the direct product of his labor.
07-09-20 00:49:46
__________________________________________________
LeeGeeGee ::: Favorites
true libertarian would allow an individual to own a means of production, such as a machine, business, or FORCE anyone to work for him. But, rather offers pay in exchange for assistance. True libertarian interact on a voluntary basis. They don't force communalization of someone elses belongings
07-09-20 00:48:17
__________________________________________________
LeeGeeGee ::: Favorites
A true libertarian would allow an individual to own a means of production, such as a machine, business, or farm, yes. And a true libertarian would not for anyone to work for him. True libertarian interact on a voluntary basis. They don't force communalization of someone elses belongings.
07-09-20 00:47:26
__________________________________________________
LeeGeeGee ::: Favorites
All "private property" means is property that is not public property. It's a fact that libertarian socialism is opposed to private ownership of the means of production. All "private ownership" means is non-public ownership.
07-09-20 00:45:16
__________________________________________________
Clean97gti ::: Favorites
A fine variant of the "No True Scotsman" logical fallacy. Here, how about I make one of my own. A true libertarian wouldn't permit an individual(s) to own those means and subjugate others for his own personal gain, thus robbing them of their freedom to produce and stealing the products of the labor of others.
07-09-20 00:45:00
__________________________________________________
Clean97gti ::: Favorites
I already explained the difference between private property and personal property. You've just chosen to selectively ignore it again. Sorry, you fail again.
07-09-20 00:42:07
__________________________________________________
LeeGeeGee ::: Favorites
The Wiki says "This equality and freedom would be achieved through the abolition of authoritarian institutions and private property[2], in order that direct control of the means of production and resources will be gained by the working class and society as a whole." That's I've been saying too. Libertarian socialism will not allow private ownership. Therefore it's not a philosophy of liberty.
07-09-20 00:40:11
__________________________________________________

No comments: